Plan and review a budget
Use budget scenarios to develop a plan, retain its review history, and compare the agreed version with actual financial performance. Keeping budgets close to statements helps reviewers move between planning assumptions and reported outcomes.Budget workflow
Create scenarios deliberately
Use separate scenarios for plans that represent meaningful alternatives, review stages, or forecast revisions. Give each scenario a purpose that another reviewer can understand without relying on private context. Examples include:- the initial annual plan;
- a management-review version;
- an approved budget;
- a later forecast that incorporates actual performance.
Review the plan
Before treating a scenario as ready:- Confirm the intended period and financial scope.
- Review material lines and the assumptions behind them.
- Compare totals across relevant scenarios or versions.
- Check the scenario history for unexpected changes.
- Validate that the plan aligns with the statement structure used for reporting.
Lock an agreed version
Lock a version when it should become a stable comparison point. Locking distinguishes the approved or reviewed plan from work that is still changing. Before locking, confirm:- the correct scenario and version are selected;
- required reviewers have completed their checks;
- material assumptions and totals are understood;
- the reporting structure is ready for later actual-versus-budget comparison.
Compare plan and performance
Use financial statement views to compare actuals with budgets and forecasts. Keep the entity, period, dimensions, and currency aligned before interpreting a variance. For a material variance:- Identify the statement row and period where it appears.
- Confirm that the budget and actual use comparable scope.
- Drill into actual transactions to explain the realized value.
- Review the budget assumptions or scenario history for the planned value.
- Record whether the difference reflects timing, volume, price, classification, or a changed business assumption.