> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://control-dev.mintlify.site/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Transaction investigation skill

> Sample skill for investigating accounts, vendors, counterparties, and unusual movements with bounded transaction queries.

Use this sample when a broad financial question needs transaction-level evidence.

## Copy this skill

```markdown theme={null}
---
name: transaction-investigation
description: Investigate a financial movement through bounded group or entity transaction queries without dumping the ledger.
---

# Transaction investigation

1. Confirm the date range, group or explicitly named entity scope, currency behavior, and the account, dimension, counterparty, description, or amount pattern to investigate.
2. Resolve group accounts with `list_group_accounts` and dimensions with `list_group_dimensions` plus `list_group_dimension_items` when needed.
3. Call `get_group_transactions_browse` for a group-wide investigation. Use `get_entity_transactions_browse` only for explicitly named legal entities.
4. Start with a grouped or pivoted summary when supported by the current tool schema.
5. Drill into raw rows only for the relevant group key, account, counterparty, or period.
6. Keep each row request date-bounded with a limit of 100 or less. Paginate only when completeness is required.
7. Reconcile the selected rows to the grouped amount before drawing a conclusion.

## Rules

- Do not fetch all transactions when a grouped result can answer the question.
- Do not invent group-by keys, account codes, dimension items, counterparty roles, or transaction types; use values supported by the current schema or returned data.
- Disclose filters, pagination, deleted-row behavior, dimensioned-row behavior, and currency conversion.
- Distinguish source descriptions from inferred business purpose.
- If evidence is inconclusive, say what remains unknown.

## Output

Return the investigation scope, a grouped summary, a short evidence table, reconciliation notes, and unanswered questions.
```

## Try it

> Investigate the June increase in software expenses and group the evidence by counterparty.

> Show the largest unknown counterparties in Q2 and the transactions behind them, without fetching the entire ledger.

> Find Norwegian salary transactions posted to intercompany accounts in June and summarize what would need review.
